This limitation is derived from the notion that occupation is temporary, the core idea of the law of occupation. This means that an occupying state is only allowed a very limited use of this property. Under the Hague Regulations of 1907, the public property of the occupied population (such as lands, forests and agricultural estates) is subject to the laws of usufruct. The extensive appropriation of land and the appropriation and destruction of property required to build and expand settlements also breach other rules of international humanitarian law. Israel’s policy of settling its civilians in occupied Palestinian territory and displacing the local population contravenes fundamental rules of international humanitarian law.Īrticle 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” It also prohibits the “individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory”. STATUS OF SETTLEMENTS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW The situation in the OPT is primarily governed by two international legal regimes: international humanitarian law (including the rules of the law of occupation) and international human rights law. International criminal law is also relevant as some serious violations may constitute war crimes. Chapter 8: Conclusion & Recommendations.Chapter 7: Corporate Responsibility Under International Standards.Chapter 6: Settlements and Third State Responsibility.Chapter 5: Human Rights Violations | Five Case Studies.Chapter 4: Online Tourism Companies Doing Business in the Settlements.Chapter 3: Israeli Settlements and International Law.Chapter 2: The Tourism Industry of the Settlements.Chapter 1: Background | The Israeli Occupation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |